Jеб Цорлисс wинг суит демо
	Просмотрено: 459 раз автор: admin  Комментарии (10)

yeah it is. he even ...

yeah it is. he even made a documentary involving various events that led to that very flight. Watching the first part of the video is a little better when you think of all the shit he went through to get there, but thats just me.

you have 3d videos ...

you have 3d videos on his channel.

Hey man can you ...

Hey man can you film something like this in 3D? It would be amazing!

The first on is ...

The first on is the Matterhorn or no?

lands on his feet ...

lands on his feet like batman

I am curious where ...

I am curious where you get your knowledge of stalling? I saw in previous comments that stall occurs at 15 degrees angle of attack, which is not often the case (if you have ever seen an airplane perform a loop, you can see that stall does not occur, even when the airplane is upside down). Stall depends on several things: air density, angle of attack, airspeed, shape of the airfoil, and even the roughness of the material the airfoil is made of. You cannot strictly determine when a wing will stall.

How you stop?

How you stop?

KIWI!

KIWI!

pretty insane, good ...

pretty insane, good shit man 

A wing does not ...

A wing does not need to be at a critical angle of attack in order to stall. He's wearing a wing-suit, remember? His stall speed is actually extremely high, meaning a stall is very capable. Untrue statements: -"In order to stall u need to go upwards in a 15 degree angle." -"wing-suits have better maneuverability because they have less mass compared to a jet." -"u first need to lose the lift which means ur going in an upward motion" I just copied the first three that I found.

lmfao ur arguement ...

lmfao ur arguement is going strong? i need to step away from the "true" debate? how is it the "only" stall not being discussed in this "debate?" flying at a speed that that exceeds 100mph, yes he cant stall, also because his angle of attack isnt critical, and wut "numerous" others that i have stated is wrong? please indulge me. I have indeed shut down ur arguement.

lmfao ur arguement ...

lmfao ur arguement is going strong? i need to step away from the "true" debate? how is it the "only" stall not being discussed in this "debate?" flying at a speed that that exceeds 100mph, yes he cant stall, also because his angle of attack isnt critical, and wut "numerous" others that i have stated is wrong? please indulge me. I have indeed shut down ur arguement.

You've shut down my ...

You've shut down my argument in no way. In fact, I'm still going strong. You're the only one who needs to step away from the true debate to something else unrelated. Though the paragraph on stalling that you copied and pasted from the internet was a correct form of a stall, it's not the only stall, like you claim it to be. In fact, it's the only stall not being discussed in this debate. Furthermore, what you have stated has also been wrong, such as "he can't stall" and numerous others.

if ur saying my ...

if ur saying my arguement is invalid because ive only argued against urs, wouldnt that be the same for u? and again tell me how ive been wrong the entire time? the "principles" of stalling and flight that I have provided are wrong? tell me how they are wrong? sorry to disappoint but ive already shut down ur arguement.

You have shut me ...

You have shut me down in no way and have only been wrong the entire argument, including with the principles of stalling and flight itself. I never said he stalled coming out of the bank, and he executed the bank with plenty of speed coming into it due to the straight trajectory at which he entered the valley. Not to mention the loss of speed is quite apparent by looking at the cameras attached to him, not the stationary camera. Your argument is invalid because you've only argued against mine.

oh really? tell me ...

oh really? tell me how my arguement is invalid and urs isnt? and no u didnt win that 1 because u never won anything. ive already shut down ur arguement a while ago so i dont see why ur still here. u mentioned "he comes out of the bank slower than when he came in" that doesnt mean he stalled or can stall. have u taken into consideration that the distance he covers from the camera to the other side is a good amount of ground, and thus making him appear smaller and slower? no? thought so

No no no, please go ...

No no no, please go back to the original post and see that I said "He can stall." If you're trying to use my own posts against me, at least get them right. Nor did I ever say "just slightly." My argument isn't invalid, but yours is and you're trying to shut mine down by changing what I said. Now stop changing what we're debating about and go back to the original debate which I posted above. Or did I already win that one?

same could be said ...

same could be said to u. u said if he changed his arm position even slightly he will stall, and guess wut he moved his whole body without stalling so again, ur arguement is invalid.

Please think back ...

Please think back to the original debate about him being more maneuverable than an FA-18 jet. If you watch the video, even with a fair amount of bank, he turned relatively slowly. He can not turn faster because it would cause a stall. I never said he did stall, but he must take these maneuvers slowly to avoid a stall. Therefore, he is not as maneuverable as an FA-18 because he is limited to what he can perform due to this reason.

if jeb had stalled, ...

if jeb had stalled, he wouldnt be alive right now so ur point is invalid

whether he came ...

whether he came out slow or not, he didnt stall so i dont see wut ur trying to get at with that. ur original point is he can stall by changing his arm position slightly. my arguement was all he had to do was tilt his body to maneuver which he did so again tell me how ur right?

If you watch the ...

If you watch the video above, you can see that Jeb carefully plans his routes to be the straightest routes possible. He's striving for the largest glide ratio, and keeps as straight of a glide as possible. The only place that he truly banks is right after 'Grinding the Crack', but he had built up immense speed as was able to turn without issue. You do notice, however, that he comes out of the bank relatively slower than when he came in. Take a look at it.

I hope u noticed ...

I hope u noticed that they dont go in a straight line. they also do turn to go to wherever theyre going which would mean ur "wingtip stall" doesnt apply

Stall delay can ...

Stall delay can occur on airfoils subject to a high angle of attack and a three-dimensional flow. When the angle of attack on an airfoil is increasing rapidly, the flow will remain substantially attached to the airfoil to a significantly higher angle of attack than can be achieved in steady-state conditions. As a result, the stall is delayed momentarily and a lift coefficient significantly higher than the steady-state maximum is achieved.